Showing posts with label displaced persons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label displaced persons. Show all posts

Thursday, 7 May 2026

Exiles: Hnizdovsky in the Vatican Archive


Jacques Hnizdovsky is well known among Ukrainian communities on five continents for his delightful engravings and artwork. I have always admired his graphic arts especially his woodcuts of cats and sheep. So, what a delight it was to find him, a few months ago, in the Vatican Archive. I say “find him” because he was not only mentioned in correspondence to the Apostolic See but there is also a sample of his art in the files. 

Since December, I have been working on a project centred around DP (Displaced Persons) that emigrated to western Canada at the end of the 1940s. Among these were a group of Ukrainian Greek Catholic priests with their wives and children. Sometimes they were also preceded or followed by parents and siblings. These families were caught up in the great population displacement that occurred due to invading Soviet and Nazi armies that caused the Second World War. The conflict left destroyed and displaced entire communities, families, and individuals, and ended with the re-drawing of the interwar European national borders. 

The Soviet Union advanced westward to encompass most ethnographic Ukrainian and Belarusian territories. Minorities on all sides of the Iron Curtain were moved and ethnically cleansed to reflect the agreements concluded at Yalta in Crimea between Stalin and the western Allies. Ukrainians who had fled Russian occupation were threatened by the Allies with forced repatriation to the “Soviet Motherland,” which would result in their execution or, at best, imprisonment in the vast Gulag. Even those who had come from Ukrainian SSR most often sought asylum in the West. Such clemency was contingent upon the willingness of western governments to accept these refugees and in their ability to find gainful employment.

The Auxiliary Bishop of Lviv, Kyr Ivan Buchko, was himself a Displaced Person. He had been stranded in Rome since 1941, when the Nazis refused him permission to return to Lviv from a fact-finding mission in South America. From his residence at the Ukrainian seminary atop the Janiculum Hill, he dedicated himself to the spiritual and material interests of Ukrainian refugees before the Apostolic See (Vatican). At the Vatican’s behest, Buchko founded a Ukrainian Refugee Committee for Italy at the end of the war. A few months later, Pope Pius XII appointed him “Apostolic Visitor” over Ukrainian DPs in Italy and, a year later, to most of the countries of Western Europe. 

Buchko’s first task was to visit DP camps and hostels and establish networks of pastoral ministry in at least eight European countries. He advocated for clergy and laity and succeeded in gaining Vatican aid and assistance for individuals, groups, and funding for various cultural and educational ventures (such as the Shevchenko Scientific Society in Munich and Paris, subsidized entirely by the Holy See). Buchko sought to intercede for each person who approach him for help regardless of their religious affiliations, and a number of Orthodox bishops, clergy, and laity became the recipients of his kindness. Most sought to emigrate from refugee camps to the Americas and Australia. After Kyr Ivan’s jurisdiction was extended to include Germany, he spent three months visiting the camps and hostels in Germany and Austria, from May to August 1948. Upon his return to Rome, he submitted a report on the 700,000 Ukrainians still living in refugee camps of those countries.  

In 1946, in a refugee camp near Munich, 33-year-old Ukrainian artist Yakiv (Jacques) Hnizdovsky attempted to express and remember the life of Ukrainian DPs in a painting which he called Скитальці (Exiles). Lithographs made of the it that same year give the title of the painting in English as "Homeless." This painting came to symbolise the plight of Ukrainian DPs and was eventually reproduced on the cover of CIUS's 1992 The Ukrainian Refugee Experience.

Unable to adequately describe the harrowing life of his fellow countrymen in the camps, Buchko included a coloured lithographic reproduction of Hnizdovsky’s painting. In his letter to the Pope, Buchko also mentioned Hnizdovsky by name. And in a cover letter addressed to Monsignor Giovanni Battista Montini (the future Paul VI), the bishop lambasted the treatment of his people by the I.R.O. and complained that the Holy See was poorly represented at that organization’s headquarters. Both letters, written in Italian, are reproduced here in translation.


Hnozdovsky painting "Exiles"


Bishop Ivan Buchko to Pope Pius XII


Rome, 2 August 1948

 

A new appeal to Christian charity on behalf of refugees.

 

Most Holy Father,


Following the august command of Your Holiness given to me at the last audience of 27 July, I take the liberty of reproducing in writing my most humble suggestion regarding the fervent desire of the refugees residing in Germany and Austria, together with their plea that Your Holiness deign to once again direct a paternal appeal to Christian charity on their behalf, and to the extent possible, during this coming October, when the Apostolate of Prayer, in accordance with the intention approved by Your Holiness, will pray for the spiritual assistance of the emigrees.

As an expression of the Ukrainian refugees’ feelings of filial love and profound gratitude to Your Holiness, I have only briefly touched on the misery they endure in the camps, and even worse, outside the camps, as I personally witnessed during the last three months of my Apostolic Visit to Germany and Austria. Among the approximately 700,000 Ukrainian refugees who have so far been unable to emigrate to find a new homeland, work, and peace, it would be difficult for me to attempt to describe the living conditions of the refugees in the camps; indeed, it would be entirely impossible to paint in all their colours their state of mind, their fear, and their desperation. I would like to add here a copy of a painting by a Ukrainian painter, Mr. Jacques Hnizdowskyj, illustrating the life of refugees in the camps in the evening. This painting gives an idea of ​​the common living conditions experienced by the majority of refugees, which have been going on for three years now, and for some of them even twice as long, that is, since 1942, when they were transported to Germany for forced labour. 

It is true that refugees are not allowed to starve, especially those living in camps administered by the I.R.O., from which they earn the bare minimum of a living, but such a life is becoming increasingly unbearable. Thus, as their desperation grows, especially in light of the rumours of impending war, cases of nervous illnesses and complete exhaustion are multiplying, which sometimes end in suicide in those with little religious foundations.

For two years now, the emigration of refugees from German and Austrian territories to Western European countries and the Americas has been ongoing, and this emigration seems to be accelerating in recent times. However, it is a shame to humanity that this so-called “aid” for refugees is not based on the principles of Christian charity, but rather on the principles of commerce, where human feelings are trampled upon. The adapted system is called labour recruitment, under which the agencies of the various countries, under agreements with the employment authorities, have the right to select from among the so-called displaced persons (D.P.s) the most physically fit individuals for physical labour in the given country. It is true that under this system preference is given to single, unmarried people, but it is also true that a large portion of the married people were recruited and left from Germany and Austria, leaving their families in the camps or outside the camps. As a result, there are often cases where the groom or bride, having arrived at their new destination, forget their obligations to the abandoned families and live a concubinary life. Reports from Western European countries (Belgium, England) are very sad in this regard. Recently, the Australian government has been recruiting men to provide labour in Australia under the express condition that the families must remain in Europe until the housing problem in Australia is resolved. There is no doubt that if this system continues – a large portion of the refugee families will be ruined, and the dependents of the migrant workers will be condemned to certain and rapid death in the poorhouses in Germany or Austria.

Of course, the refugee problem is difficult and complicated. It is certain that every government, beyond the desire to come to the aid of the poor refugees, will also have the interests of its own nation before its eyes and consequently has the right to admit individuals into its country whose presence will contribute to the development of that country. It would be asking too much of governments to open the doors of their countries to all refugees, even individuals.

But on the other hand, it is true that the precarious nature of the problem arises from the international situation, and consequently human society should grant refugees unfit for repatriation some asylum and protection combined with humane treatment and stop treating them as objects of merchandise based on the principles of selfishness. The divine commandment to love one's neighbour applies today as it has always applied to every man, including those in government.

An excellent solution to the problem would be to allow immigration from some of the countries where all refugees of one nationality are present. If, however, this solution is not feasible for any reason, the principle of family consideration should be at least unconditionally observed, allowing the recruited worker to take with him all dependent family members—not only the wife and children, but also the parents and minor siblings, both on his and his wife's side. It is absolutely necessary to permanently break the current system of separating family members; a system brutally practiced in the Soviet Union.

It is equally essential to consider the spiritual needs of the recruited worker, ensuring he receives spiritual assistance during travel and at the workplace. Each group of 100 workers should be joined by a priest, if not several members of the intellectual class, to assist the immigrants in their religious and cultural needs. Christian charity will certainly find a way to help the emigration of intellectuals and professionals who are not suited to physical labour, nor will it leave without help the most unfortunate victims of war: invalids, the elderly, widows, orphans.

The refugees are confident that Your Holiness's paternal appeal will awaken Christian consciences and open the hearts of the wealthy to their unfortunate brothers who have lost everything, including their homeland, in order to save their lives and the Catholic faith.

Your Holiness, during my last trip on the Apostolic Visit of the Ukrainians to Germany and Austria, I heard complaints from the refugees that the Catholics of various wealthy countries—especially those overseas—have shown little interest in the matter, compared to the activities of the various Protestant Churches on behalf of the refugees. To dispel these rumours, I would like to suggest one more thing, which, in addition to Your Holiness's Fatherly Message, would also be very effective in sparking the interest of Catholics around the world in the refugee problem, while also bringing great consolation to the refugees themselves. I most humbly ask Your Holiness to convene an international congress of charitable organizations in Rome, together with the Apostleship of Prayer, on the occasion mentioned above, that is, next October, for the purpose of deliberating and seeking ways to resolve the refugee problem according to the principles of Christian charity. 

Prostrate at the feet of Your Holiness, I beg your Paternal Apostolic Blessing for my Ukrainian people, so sorely tried, especially for that portion in exile scattered across almost all the countries of the world, and I profess to be

Your Holiness’ most devoted, most humble, most respected son

+Ivan Bučko, Titular Bishop of Cadi

Apostolic Visitor

 

Bishop Ivan Buchko to Monsignor Giovanni Battista Montini

 

Rome, 2 August 1948

 

Your Excellency,

 

I humbly beg Your Excellency to present at the feet of His Holiness my attached letter, concerning the refugees’ plea for a new appeal from the Holy Father on their behalf.

            On this occasion, I feel it is my duty in conscience to inform Your Excellency more precisely about the refugees’ complaints, as if the assistance provided thus far by Catholic organizations on their behalf was grossly inadequate compared to the charitable work of Protestant organizations, not to mention Jewish organizations.

I have heard the same objection from Catholic members of the British Military Government in Germany (Colonel Anthony Coventry). In particular, these objections are made against the Vatican Migration Office with its headquarters in Geneva, under the direction of the Most Reverend Father Edward Killion, CSSR. His news of the creation of the aforementioned Office by the Holy See was of great comfort to the refugees, but subsequent realities would have demonstrated that too much trust on the part of the refugees was illusory – these are the words of the refugees who turned to the aforementioned Office in their cases.

I do not know exactly what form the Vatican Migration Office would have, but I could guess that the purpose of creating such an Office would have been close contact with the I.R.O. Headquarters in Geneva, the care of the interests of the emigration refugees, especially in cases of appeal made by a given refugee from the unjust decision of the I.R.O. employees. In Germany and Austria, or in other countries, the majority of whose employees are non-Catholic; there are also pro-Communists among them who dare to insult Catholic refugees. Sometimes their decisions are to the material and moral detriment of the refugees.

It was clear that the Office's primary concern would be to ensure the spiritual assistance of individual groups of refugees traveling as workers both in European and overseas countries, and the I.R.O. refused to transport them if the agencies recruiting the labour force did not consider this, so important in the refugees' lives. Generally speaking, the Vatican Migration Office should have served as the Centre for Emigration Affairs, which operates on-site in the individual military occupation zones of Germany and Austria.

            On my return from my trip, I found myself in Geneva to consult with the heads of the I.R.O. on matters concerning the fate of the Ukrainian refugees. On that occasion, I paid a respectful visit to the Most Reverend Father Killion, CSSR, Director of the Office in question, at his headquarters, namely the Wilson Palace. To be honest, I found this Office very modest, perhaps too much so compared to other similar offices. It occupies a single small room, in which the Most Reverend Father Director works, employing a typist who, in addition, is in poor health and must be absent frequently. From the friendly conversation I had with the Most Reverend Father Director, I learned that, despite his excellent will, he is not capable of attending to and handling all the business assigned to his Office. The very authority of the Holy See, whose name the Office bears, would require the Office to be somewhat more fully equipped. He feels the lack of some employee who could replace him, at least during office hours, when he himself must travel to the headquarters of the I.R.O. Heads.

I humbly ask Your Most Reverend Excellency to accept on this occasion the expressions of my profound veneration and respect, with which I am grateful to be able to reaffirm myself as always,

Your Excellency’s most devoted Servant

 

[Note: Father Killion and the Vatican representation at the I.R.O. had interceded successfully for Ukrainian refugees on many occasions since July 1947].

Tuesday, 18 March 2025

Pius XII Against Forced Repatriation


 
Letter of Bishop Ivan Buchko to Pope Pius XII

Pax Christi in Regno Christi!

Rome, December 16, 1945.

Most Holy Father,

prostrate at the feet of Your Holiness, I humbly implore Your most benevolent paternal intercession with the American military authorities in Germany on behalf of the Soviet Ukrainian refugees, who, despite repeated assurances given by the aforementioned authorities that they will no longer be subject to forced repatriation, are being forced in these very days to that unwanted repatriation on the basis of an order given to all refugees of former Soviet citizenship, who are in the American occupation zone, to move by the 8th of December to concentration camps under Soviet command in Neunkirchen and Stuttgart and to surrender themselves into the hands of the Bolsheviks. Today, within the  hour, I received an urgent telegram from the Ukrainian Aid Committee in Malines, Belgium, which informed us that 22,000 (twenty-two thousand) refugees are threatened with forced repatriation, to whom the American command has already refused to give food and lodging in the American camps. The recalcitrant Ukrainian refugees, refusing to surrender to the Soviet command and preferring death, have asked for 15 days of delay or postponement to be able to prepare for a Christian death. The postponement was granted by the friendly officials but the deadline expires on the 23rd of December. In the meantime, refugees in the Hannai camp, refusing to be transferred to the Soviet camps in Stuttgart and Neunkirchen, have committed suicide. Those who are still alive have only hope in the paternal benevolence of Your Holiness, whose powerful intercession and most benevolent paternal protection could still save their lives. On behalf of those unfortunate beings, as a most humble son of Your Holiness, I have permitted myself to submit before the feet of Your Holiness this my most humble supplication, imploring at the same time for them and for myself the most benevolent paternal Apostolic Blessing.

 Audience of Cardinal Eugène Tisserant with Pope Pius XII

Msgr. Bučko informed the Sacred Congregation that he had humbly placed in the hands of the Holy Father through His Excellency Msgr. Montini a petition aimed at obtaining the intervention of His Holiness with the American authorities in order to prevent the forced handover to the Soviets of 22,000 Ukrainian refugees from their zone of occupation, a handover that would be carried out despite the assurances given to the contrary.

The Sacred Congregation is profoundly grateful to the Holy Father for all that has already been done and will be done to avoid the forced repatriation of those refugees, who prefer death by suicide to handover to the Soviets.

Ex audientia Sanctissimi 22 December 1945

The Holy Father expressed His desire to see all Ukrainian refugees spared and to assist them in every way.

Monday, 20 December 2021

Exsul Familia – A Family in Exile




Last August, a 68-year-old document was extracted from decades of dust into the light of the present and republished in Italian by the Vatican press. It was Pius XII’s Apostolic Constitution, Exsul Familia Nazarethana, or the Nazarene (Holy) Family in Exile, first issued on 1 August 1952. 

An Apostolic Constitution is the most solemn form of legislation issued by the popes, in the form of a bulla (led-sealed parchment). The background to this was that the Second World War had forced 12.6 million displaced persons (DPs) to seek refuge in various western European countries. Over 3 million of them were Ukrainian. These refugees asked to be ministered to by clergy that spoke their native languages and understood their customs and cultures. Many bishops asked Rome to issue guidelines, the result of which was the first systematic reflection on human migration in the papal magisterium.

Pius XII noted that displaced persons lose much of their security and human dignity, and help up the example of the Holy Family from Nazareth (Jesus, Mary, and Joseph) as an example for migrants of every age. The document also outlined the nature and extent of papal charitable works in favour of millions of DPs, during and after the war (from which Ukrainian religious and cultural entities also benefited). It called for greater, more specified pastoral care of refugees, mandating that ethnic, linguistic, and ritual traditions be supported by local Catholic hierarchs. For its extensive substance and provisions, Exsul Familia became known as the magna carta of migration.

The papal charter was also significant for offering a reflection, not merely on the migration of ethnicities, but also of rites. It provided indications on how the powerful Latin Church should deal with the smaller, more vulnerable Particular Churches. Bishoprics established in the twentieth century for Byzantine-Rite Catholics in Canada, USA, Brazil, and even Italy, were cited as examples of papal solicitude. For the Ukrainian Catholic Church, which had been violently suppressed by the Soviets in countries within their “sphere of influence,” this confirmed the pope’s promise to protect it and restore it in the lands of immigration.

The teaching of Exsul Familia was supposed to serve as a buttress against resourceless Eastern Catholics being forced to assimilate to predominant Latin Rite in their countries of refuge. It was also expected that that Eastern-Catholic missionaries would henceforth be given a freer hand by local Latin hierarchs. Surprisingly, the opposite happened. Exsul Familia laid down principals but its implementation had been entrusted to Roman Curial department known as the Consistorial Congregation. The juridical norms issued by that department replaced existing apostolic visitations to ethnic and linguistic groups with priest-delegates responsible to the Consistorial.


From the moment these norms appeared, diocesan functionaries began to question the authority of Archbishop Ivan Buchko, the Apostolic Visitor for Ukrainian Catholics, who had been granted direct authority over the clergy and faithful throughout western Europe. The wording of the norms made it appear that the papal constitution had also supressed Buchko’s jurisdiction. Chancery functionaries told Buchko’s officials that they would have to apply to become ethnic delegates under Latin diocesan structures. Buchko appealed to the Congregation Pro Ecclesia Orientali to resolve the issue. On 16 November 1953, that Congregation's head, Cardinal Eugène Tisserant, addressed an official letter to Archbishop Buchko, clarifying that Exsul Familia and its accompanying norms did not pertain to the Eastern Rites. 

The Latin Particular Church has long had issues with ritual and spiritual diversity within the Catholic Communion and, historically, has very often mistaken itself to be the unique expression of Catholicism. Having experienced this first-hand, at home and in exile, Buchko acted quickly to have more permanent structures put in place. Following the Exsul debate, he petitioned the Oriental Congregation replace his visitation with apostolic exarchates. These were indeed established: in Britain, in 1957; in Germany, 1959; and in France in 1960. 


Hieromonk Parteniy Pavlyk's 
the Holy Family's Flight into Egypt
 
In August 1962. on the eve of the Second Vatican Council, a conference was held in Rome to commemorate the tenth anniversary of Exsul Familia. In attendance was Augustine Hornyak, Auxiliary Bishop and soon to be Exarch for Ukrainian Catholics in Britain. The conference and perhaps even more so the papal charter made a  great impression on the freshly-minted bishop, whose flock identified as скитальці or post-war political “exiles.” When seeking financial assistance for a suitable cathedral church, he pleaded with the papal representative in London: “I am asking for a part of the Universal Church of Christ, for an Exsul Familia, which wants to survive here and sustain the ‘Church of Silence’ in our homeland.” After receiving a large subsidy, Hornyak surprised everyone by christening his new cathedral “Holy Family in Exile” after Pius XII’s Apostolic Constitution. The name “Пресвята Родина в Скиталю” was also intended as a reminder to his flock that the Almighty, who had temporarily permitted the Holy Family’s exile, would, one day, allow exiled Ukrainians to return to their own native land.



The year 2022 will mark two important anniversaries: the seventy fifth anniversary of the canonical establishment of the Ukrainian Catholic Church in Britain (3 March 1947), and the seventieth anniversary of Pius XII’s Exsul Familia (1 August 1952). In an introduction contained in its new edition, Professor Andrea Tornielli of Vatican Communications notes that Pope Francis’ teachings on migrants have their roots in Exsul Familia. What many in Rome and elsewhere will be surprised to learn is that a cathedral in London, the spiritual Nazareth of thousands of migrant workers today, stands as a living witness to the first Catholic migrants’ charter.